Negligent Auditor Claims | Negligence Solicitors

We provide expert legal advice on professional negligence claims against all auditors. When financial information is inaccurately recorded or erroneous it can cause serious legal ramifications for auditors.

Auditors have a duty to look into the substantial accuracy of any given account, to ensure they correctly represent the state of the company’s affairs. This duty only requires the auditor to have been reasonably careful in their role.

In the instance where a claim of fraud is established in a company, the auditor will not automatically be held to have been negligent in failing to detect the fraud. Therefore, to establish whether an auditor has been negligent, it is necessary to prove that a reasonably competent auditor exercising normal skill and care would have identified the fraud.

Common examples of successful claims against auditors

In recent years it has become apparent that some of the more successful cases against negligent auditors have been where there has been a misunderstanding as to the degree of responsibility which the auditor was to assume in giving advice. Therefore, it is essential that you distinguish your claim between:

a) negligence which has been carried out contrary to agreed terms; or

b) a dispute that has arisen due to a misunderstanding regarding assumed duties of the auditor.

What happens if I do not have a written agreement with my auditor?

If there is no express contractual written agreement between you and your auditor, then the standard of work is implied by section 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, where it states:

‘in a contract for the supply of a service where the supplier is acting in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service with reasonable care and skill’.

How can I prove that my auditor has been negligent?

In order to sue an auditor for negligence, a claimant must establish three essential elements to the civil standard of proof (on a balance of probabilities, i.e. it must be proved by the claimant that the financial adviser’s breach of duty caused the claimant to suffer loss).

1.Demonstrate that the auditor owed you a duty of care: the boundary lines between when a tortious duty of care is owed or not owed is subject to tests that are being continuously evolved by the courts. A duty of care exists where the auditor can be shown to have objectively assumed responsibility.

2. Establish that the auditor has breached the duty of care owed to you: proving breach will obviously vary depending on the individual circumstances of the case. A claimant needs to demonstrate that the breach shows that the auditor fell below the standards of a reasonably competent adviser in that speciality.

3. Prove that the auditor’s breach caused loss to you: you must prove both factual and legal causation. The test for factual causation is that “but for” the auditor’s breach you would not have suffered loss. Legal causation must also be proved i.e. the loss must be reasonably foreseeable at the time when the relevant duty was breached.

What is the time limit for commencing a claim against my auditor?

Time limits and limitation periods are essential to adhere to in litigation. Missing a limitation period is fatal to the chances of success of any claim and will leave a claim statute barred.

When it comes to ascertaining the limitation date for a particular claim, there are a number of factors to consider. In simple terms, the limitation period is six years from the accrual of the cause of action (section 2, Limitation Act 1980). However, if the six year time limit has passed but you have only just discovered the effect of any latent damage, then the limitation period may be extended to three years from the date of knowledge (section 14A, Limitation Act 1980).

If you have a complaint against an auditor, then our advice is that you take independent legal advice as soon as possible.

Book an Initial Consultation with our Professional Negligence Lawyers

Do you have a claim against a professional? If you want expert legal advice, do not delay in instructing us so we can assess the legal merit of your case.

We can often take on such claims on a no win no fee basis (such as a Conditional Fee Arrangement) once we have discussed the claim with you and then assessed and advised you on the merits of the proposed professional negligence action.

Our expert legal team of leading Professional Negligence Solicitors & Barristers can provide urgent help, advice or representation to you. Just call our Professional Negligence Lawyers on 02071830529 or email us now.

Instruct Specialist Professional Negligence Solicitors

We are a specialist City of London law firm made up of Solicitors & Barristers operating from the only law firm based in the Middle Temple Inn of Court adjacent to the Royal Courts of Justice. Our team have expertise in advising on claims for compensation against professionals that have fallen below the standard expected, which causes clients financial or personal loss. We are experienced in bringing successful claims against negligent solicitors, barristers, financial advisers, surveyors, auditors, architects, tax advisers and IFAs.

House keys left in the lock of a slate blue front door on a London terrace, illustrating completion money stolen in conveyancing fraud

Completion money stolen by fraudsters: can you sue your conveyancer?

Yes, in many cases you can sue. If your conveyancer paid your completion money to a fraudster, the firm has usually broken the trust on which it held your money and must put it back, even where nobody at the firm acted dishonestly. If you sent the money yourself after a fake email, the claim is harder, and it depends on whether the firm warned you and whether it kept its own systems secure.

Circuit board, molecule model and unopened envelope on a walnut desk, illustrating an R&D tax credit adviser negligence claim

R&D Tax Claim Rejected? Can You Sue Your Adviser?

Yes, a company can sue its R&D tax credit adviser if the adviser was negligent and the company lost money because of it. The harder question is what that loss is. Money HMRC claws back because the company was never entitled to it is often unrecoverable. Lost valid relief, penalties, interest, wasted fees and the cost of fighting HMRC usually can be claimed.

Realistic office desk with investment loss reports, a laptop displaying a falling financial chart, a calculator and organised legal documents illustrating claims for losses from a collapsed investment scheme in the UK.

Lost money in a collapsed investment scheme: what the court looks at

A court looks at four things, in order, when you lose money in a collapsed investment scheme and sue the professional who advised on it: whether that professional owed you a duty, what the duty was meant to protect you against, whether their mistake caused your loss, and what you are left with once everything you received is set against what you paid in. A claim can fail at any one of those stages, and the fourth catches more investors than they expect.

A detailed model of a classic London townhouse alongside legal documents, gold coins, and a fountain pen set against a sweeping view of historic London architecture at golden hour, symbolizing Stamp Duty tax and property law.

Stamp Duty Mistake by Your Conveyancer: Can You Claim Compensation?

Discover when a stamp duty mistake by your conveyancer amounts to professional negligence. Learn how to reclaim overpaid SDLT, recover compensation for tax losses and penalties, and protect your claim against limitation deadlines.

Solicitor’s client file tied with legal tape on a desk, one document folded back as if hidden from the client

Does Your Solicitor Have to Tell You They Made a Mistake?

Yes. A solicitor in England and Wales who realises something has gone wrong on your matter must be honest and open with you about it, and paragraph 7.11 of the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors requires them to “explain fully and promptly what has happened and the likely impact”. The High Court has also accepted that a firm can owe you a legal duty to advise on its own possible negligence, so staying silent can be a breach in its own right. The qualification is that none of this obliges the firm to admit liability, and the civil duty only arises where the firm knew, or ought to have known, of a significant risk that its own work was negligent.

Realistic office desk with pension transfer documents, a laptop displaying retirement savings graphics, a calculator and financial planning notes illustrating UK pension transfer and SIPP negligence claims.

Pension Transfer or SIPP Advice Gone Wrong: Can You Claim?

Was your pension transfer or SIPP advice wrong, or just unlucky? Find out how the FCA’s suitability rules, the Financial Ombudsman, the FSCS and the courts apply, which time limits matter, and what to do first if you think you were mis-advised.

Fountain pen on an unsigned legal document tied with pink tape on a solicitor’s desk

Negligent Will Writing: Can You Claim for a Defective Will?

Yes. If a solicitor or will writer prepared or supervised a will so badly that a gift meant for you failed, you can usually sue them for the value of what you lost, even though you were never their client. The qualification is that the court expects you to try any cheaper rescue first, such as rectifying the will, and one of the time limits starts running on the day the will is signed, which can be many years before the death.

An unattended professional office desk with an open laptop, a thick stack of client documents in a worn folder, a closed navy binder and an empty office chair, suggesting unresolved client matters following a professional’s insolvency.

Insolvent Professional? Claim Against Their Insurer

A negligent adviser who has gone bust is not always a dead end. Learn how a 2010 law can pass their insurance rights to you, what the insurer can argue, the deadlines to watch and what advice costs.